SPACE INTERVIEWS
James L. Caddigan, Jr. (12/9/1999)
RR: To start off, what
were your father's precise position and duties at DuMont in
1949?
JC: My Dad left Paramount
Pictures in Boston in the late 40s to join
Dr. DuMont in the
formation of TV broadcast facilities in New York. By title,
he was the Director of Programming and Production for the
DuMont Network. In the very early days and in that capacity
he was responsible for the development of programming to
fill the broadcast day. I can recall a low-cost program
originally from Cincinatti and later from New York that
featured Sis Camp and Paul Dixon lip-syncing to popular
songs of the day. As the network grew he produced several
shows and brought many well known programs to the air
including Jackie Gleason and The Calvacade Of Stars (first introduction of The
Honeymooners), Bishop Fulton Sheen, the Program
Playhouse,
and Big Brother Bob Emery. His introduction of religious
programming was as important to TV's development as was
CV.
RR: Do you have any
idea what suggested to him that the time was ripe, despite
the infancy of TV and the very limited audiences, for a
science-fiction-themed adventure program aimed at children?
JC: As I recall his
comments later in life, the budget restrictions under which
he had to operate were so restrictive that he had to develop
truly low cost programs with limited commercial sponsorship.
One readily available source of programming was a great
number of western "cowboy" movies. His hesitancy to use
them was based on the need to find a vehicle to show them
that would have audience appeal. The concept for
Captain
Video was
born from that need--- my father recognized the success of
the Saturday movie house serials with such science fictional
story lines as Buck Rogers. The two concepts quickly came
together. He called on his past experiences in the film
industry wherein the Saturday matinee usually showed one or
two westerns with at least one installment of the serial.
For TV, he reversed the roles and used the science fiction
theme as the vehicle to show the films.
RR: For those who have never seen a Captain Video episode, we should explain
that for the entire weekday run of the 30-minute show, we
would see about 6 or 7 minutes of live action with Captain
Video and his Rangers, then cut to about 15 minutes of an
old cowboy movie on the "Remote Teleceiver" at Ranger
Headquarters, the cowboy hero always being introduced as one
of Captain Video's "agents out west," and then we had
about 6 minutes more live action with Captain Video! In
four or five days, a complete B-western would be shown in
this way.
Getting back to specifics, do you know why your father chose
to approach Larry Menkin and M. C. Brockhauser about
creating and writing such a program?
JC: Not specifically, but I must assume he knew them by reputation, especially Menkin.
My Dad had a warehouse of talented people tucked away in his
head and had an uncanny talent to find the folks he needed
to "pull things together".
RR: Do you know
anything about Olga Druce, who became producer of
CV after
Larry Menkin, in about 1951-2, and who made huge changes in
the look of the show, by getting new costumes, new sets,
good special effects and even good scripts, from well-known
science fiction writers of the day?
JC: No, I am sorry that
that I have no recall of her except a vague recollection of
her name.
RR: As a child you
were around the DuMont studios. Any personal memories of
the studios, particular programs, the sets, the actors...
particularly for Captain Video?
JC: I have many! Let me
start with
CV. I vividly
recall sitting in what was a balcony surrounding the set of
CV on the
lower level. There was a great use of cardboard in those
days and, by today's standards, the sets were actually
comical. If there was a need for an elevated shot, the
camera was either raised up on some stacked boxes or
dismantled and brought up to the balcony. There was no such
thing as a boom! As you already know, the Wannamaker store
was a ready source for props and the back halls were often
used for chase scenes and the like. Although only 12 when
CV was first broadcast, I held a fascination for
the production aspects of the show as much as I did for the
story line itself. In later years I spent a lot of time in
the Adelphi Theater where the Bishop Sheen and
Cavalcade
Of Stars
shows were broadcast in front of live audiences. I was
honored in those years to be introduced to the Bishop,
Jackie Gleason, Art Carney, Maury Amsterdam and several
others who appeared on those shows. I met Mr Amsterdam
several years later in Europe when he was doing the Military
Club circuit (As an aside, my wife was very pregnant and
Amsterdam made too many references to "little Jimmy
Caddigan" during his show that caused my wife to laugh her
way to the delivery room later that night). Al Hodge was a
college classmate of my stepmother and that may have had
some bearing on his selection for the role as
CV (my
speculation --- not known fact). I also spent time in the
DuMont Telecenter in New York. That facility was originally
the East Side Opera House that my Dad had gutted to its
shell and rebuilt as the network headquarters and several
integrated studios. I recall seeing his plans for the
building and they were drawn by him at home in great detail.
I recall discussions centering on his ability to do that
without any training as a design engineer. To my knowledge,
the New York FOX facilities used that facility for several
years. For all I know they may still be doing so. It was in
the Adelphi and the Telecenter that I was introduced to the
DuMont TV Electronicam, a unit that mounted a movie camera
next to an orthicon head using a unitary lens system. My Dad
invented that capability that allowed the recording of
filmed programming in almost real time using three cameras
just as in any other TV operation. He failed to secure a
patent in his own name, a fact that was overshadowed by the
introduction of video tape a short time later.
RR: Let me ask a bit
more about that. If I understand it correctly, your
father's system allowed the TV cameramen to make a 16 mm
movie of precisely what the TV camera lens was showing.
This was very different from the kinescope process used by
other networks, in which a 16 mm film was made of the very
bright image on a very small picture tube. One difference
was that the kinescope system showed the actual broadcast of
the program. In your father's system, the images were much
sharper, but didn't a film editor then have to edit them
together to match the director's switches from camera to
camera during the live broadcast?
JC: The system had a built
in capability to allow the director from his booth to call
shots just as in live TV using three cameras. The system
automatically put an edit mark on the film as the shot was
called thus eliminating the need to truly edit. It resulted
in very little effort required to cut and splice at the
right marks. The end result had the same effect as in a live
show.
RR: Do you have any
favorite stories or vivid memories related to these early
days, TV broadcasting and your father? Many sources suggest
Allan B. DuMont was an amazing character and a great
engineer but the very last person who should have been in
charge of a TV network! Any response?
JC: I think I have
responded already to the question of memories. I agree that
Dr. DuMont was a brilliant engineer but a man with very
little business acumen. It is only an opinion, of course,
but I feel that it was his lack of business sense that
eventually cost the existence of both his manufacturing and
broadcast ventures. I think that now as a 63-year-old
looking back, I would not have the awareness of good
business practices at the time to make such a judgement
beyond limited recall of my Dad's comments along those
lines. His engineering talent was widely recognized. I
recall the first color set brought into our home with 16
controls just for the color. A van load of technicians
arrived once a week to adjust it. My Dad brought home a 40
inch TV set in about 1953; the first of such a size and one
not marketed for several years. The largest I have in my
home today is a 36 inch screen!
RR: A friend of mine
who is an avid collector of electronics from the 1940s and
50s actually has a projection TV, from the early 50s. Only
5 were made, specifically for NBC executives. A very bright
picture tube rear-projects directly through a huge lens onto
a ground-glass screen about 3 feet by 3 feet. Amazing. Was
the DuMont set one with a conventional but gigantic (for the
day) picture tube?
JC: Yes! The set we had at
home was a tube-- not projection!
RR: What did your
father do after DuMont collapsed in about 1955? Can you
briefly sketch his subsequent career?
JC: He consulted for a
time and eventually formed a company producing industrial
films throughout the Midwest. He managed that firm until
his death at the age of 65 in 1972.
RR: Is there anything
else you think we need to know about this heroic era of live
TV?
JC: As a youngster growing
up in the wings of a developing industry I must agree with
your choice of the word "heroic" in describing those early
days. The players were indeed pioneers and all made a
lasting mark on today's glitzy media. There are so many
names I recall that are probably lost in history. I remember
Harry Coyle loaning me his 1965 T-Bird. Harry was a sports
director who went on to spend many years with NBC. I
remember Frank Bunetta who was the director of the
Sheen and
Cavalcade
Shows. I remember spending time with so many of the stage
hands, electricians and musicians in the Adelphi Theater.
Dad's program originating from the St. Louis Zoo was a
pioneering effort that has remained popular under differing
formats until today. The things that happen routinely in
today's TV world were pioneering developments back then and
the legacy of those efforts should give us all pause to say
thanks for a job well done to the forward thinking folks who
had the foresight to think of them.
I hope I have given you something worthwhile and that I have
not rambled too far from your wishes! It has afforded
genuine pleasure me to think about things that have not been
in my mind for many years and I thank you for that. I very
much enjoyed reviewing your web site and wish you continuing
success in your quest to preserve a very important time in
our history.
James L. Caddigan in the heady DuMont days.